Tuesday, May 1, 2012

Sabo Bridge may reopen soon



Minneapolis considers opening the bridge back up before a permanent repair is completed.

by Tesha M. Christensen

The Martin Olav Sabo Bridge may soon open back up to pedestrian and bike traffic.
Experts are investigating whether Minnesota’s only cable-stayed suspension  bridge could be opened to users before a permanent fix is made, according to Minneapolis Public Works deputy director Heidi Hamilton.
The five-year-old bridge has been closed since Feb. 19, 2012 when a pair of cables was found lying on the bridge deck. The Chicago-based firm Wiss, Janney and Elstner (WJE) is currently investigating why the anchor plates holding the cables fractured. Minneapolis and Hennepin County are splitting the $150,000 fee.
In order to reopen the Sabo Bridge, one major question needs to be answered. “We need to know if the shoring in place is adequate to support a live load of bicyclists and pedestrians,” said Hamilton. The original design engineering firm, URS, will answer that question in early May.
Meanwhile, the search for answers as to why the anchor plates fractured continues. Several instruments were installed by city workers and WJE staff the week of April 16 that will provide experts with important data about how the bridge handles weather and wind conditions.
According to Minneapolis Bridge Engineer Jack Yunza, anemometers were installed to track wind speed, duration of wind and temperature during wind events. Strain gauges, displacement transducers and accelerometers will provide actual stress range movement, amplitude and frequency of cable vibrations experienced by the bridge during wind events. These instruments will be monitored 24 hours a day.
Together, these two pieces of data will be correlated to provide a complete picture of what’s happening to the bridge in all kinds of weather, explained Yunza.
The data from these instruments will then be reviewed alongside the report of why the plates broke. The metalurgical analysis of the broken plates is being done by Lehigh University in Pennsylvania.
Yunza stated, “The the information gathered will become the basis for the repair plan.”

This story printed in the May edition of the Longfellow/Nokomis Messenger.

Sunday, April 1, 2012

Safe pedestrian crossings goal of Hiawatha Avenue project





Minnehaha-Hiawatha Community Works focuses on pedestrian/bicyclist safety at 32nd St., 38th St. and 46th St.

by Tesha M. Christensen

Frustrated crossing Hiawatha Avenue either on foot or on bike? You’re not alone.
After learning this is a safety concern of local residents, Minneahaha-Hiawatha Community Works (MHCW) began working to do something about it.
The plan is to target three intersections: 32nd St., 38th St., and 46th St. A number of changes will be made, according to Robb Luckow of Community Works.
The timing of lights will be adjusted so that people have more time to cross the wide street. Federal standards have recently changed, and these new recommendations will be followed. This project will tie into the traffic signal changes that will be done this year to help traffic flow better.
The area between the north and south lane will be widened so that those who haven’t had time to cross will have enough space to safely wait for the next opportunity.
Bump-outs will be added to not only make motorists more visibly aware of pedestrians and bicyclists, but also to narrow the width of the crossings so that it doesn’t take as long.
Several of the crosswalks are crooked; these will be straightened out and widened. The intersections will also be upgraded to meet standards set by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
Luckow acknowledged that often people aren’t using the intersections to get to the light rail transit stations, particularly at the 46th Street station where the station is located north of the intersection. The hope is that when the intersection is improved, people will walk down there to cross because it will be much safer and more convenient.
“Biking on Hiawatha is not a pleasant experience not only from the high speed traffic, but the way cars stop and enter from the side streets,” observed DeWayne Townsend, co-chair of the Longfellow Community Council Environment and Transportation Committee.  “Cars block bike lanes by pulling out to far and turn without looking for bikes.” He added that all the intersections are dangerous because of the high traffic on Hiawatha but he thinks the higher bike and pedestrian usage at the LRT stops make 38th and 46th the most likely to have an accident.
“Anything that improves pedestrian use and safety is a good thing,” observed Longfellow Community Council (LCC) Executive Director Melanie Majors. She noted that the biggest complaint she hears from residents is the traffic timing at the lights on Hiawatha.
Townsend believes that when the timing on the lights is changed, it will cut down on folks crossing against the light because they are tired of waiting.
“If the changes bring about the improvements that are expected it will significantly improve transportation in and out of the community,” Townsend stated.
The success of commercial and residential development is closely tied to whether people can get around by bike, car or foot, Majors pointed out. If people can’t access an area, they won’t go there. She applauded the county for pre-planning rather than treating pedestrian improvements as an afterthought, especially in light of the pedestrian safety concerns that will come this year with the new commercial/residential development on the southeast side of the 38th/Hiawatha intersection.
“Hennepin County is essentially heading those off by moving on the pedestrian improvements,” Majors said.
In mid-March, Hennepin County, Longfellow Community Council, the Corcoran Neighborhood Organization, and Standish-Ericsson Neighborhood Association hosted three open houses to talk about recommendations to improve pedestrian crossings along Hiawatha Avenue.
The next step for Community Works is to identify potential funding sources to implement this project. According to Luckow, the total cost will be $500,000.
Once the funds are obtained, the work will begin.
WHAT IS COMMUNITY WORKS?
A project of Hennepin County, Minnehaha-Hiawatha Community Works collaborates closely with the city of Minneapolis, Met Transit and the Minnesota Department of Transportation -- all the entities that have jurisdiction along Hiawatha. “It’s a nice partnership between these four organizations,” Luckow stated.
The pedestrian improvement project is one of 16 projects laid out in the MHCW Strategic Investment Framework that was recently adopted by the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners. These infrastructure investments aim to:
  Improve the ability to walk, bike, drive, and travel to and through the corridor;
• Support business vitality and job creation;
• Create a diverse set of housing, commercial, and employment opportunities to serve the community;
• Enhance the sense of community while honoring its history; and,
• Promote environmental sustainability.
There are several positions open on the steering committee, which will oversee implementation of these projects. For more information, contact Robb Luckow at 612.348.9344 or Robb.luckow@co.hennepin.mn.us.
The project area includes 28th Street south to Minneahaha Creek. The three intersections where changes will be made to improve pedestrian safety were identified as the top priority by residents at a variety of meetings over several years. Input was gathered at the Midtown Farmer’s Market, LCC annual meeting, Longfellow corn feed, light rail stations, door-to-door, and via the web site.
“People are looking forward to the opportunity to make changes in the area,” stated Luckow.

 This story printed in the April edition of the Longfellow/Nokomis Messenger.

Keewaydin playground location set


New equipment and pool will go to the southeast of park building

by Tesha M. Christensen

Although the parks department doesn’t yet know when the playground will be replaced at Keewaydin Park, it does know where it will be located.
After a community meeting in March, the decision was made to position the playground and pool to the east of the park building, on land that once housed tennis courts.
The playground equipment will be displaced by the expansion of Keewaydin School. The groundbreaking on a $16 million addition that will double the size of Keewaydin School will be held in June; work is expected to be underway by the third week of June and continue for one year. At that time, part of the existing playground will be off limits.
“The K-12 play structure and wading pool will be open for use throughout and after construction,” noted Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board Project Manager Deborah Bartels.  “The pre-K structure, the swings, and the Galaxy spinners will be removed to facilitate construction.”
Since a design of the school expansion was first released to the public in January, the school district has continued to modify the footprint. “There has been a concentrated effort to compact the building so there would be more play space to the southern end,” observed Doug Walters of the Nokomis East Neighborhood Association who serves on the school construction steering committee.
This not only lowers the construction cost of the school building, but also may allow the pool to remain where it is until the parks department is able to set aside funds for its replacement, he said.
In the first expansion design, the addition was located on top of the existing playground and pool. It will no longer extend that far south.
TWO CONCEPTS PRESENTED
At the March community park meeting, attendees evaluated two concept plans. Concept one included one ball field, two soccer fields, two tennis court, and a playground/pool area where on ball field is currently located on the southwest side of the park property.
While this would position the playground close to the school, some residents were concerned about policing as the area would be difficult to see from the street, noted Bartels.
This would place the playground and pool near the school loading dock and garbage area, as well as next to a large gymnasium wall without windows, pointed out Walters. Additionally, the soil in this area is peat, and in order to put a playground there better soil would need to be hauled in, upping the cost of the project. In the past, this area was a swamp and a dump. The school will need to drive pilings in 90 feet in order to construct its addition in the area.
A representative from the Minnehaha Falls Athletic Club (MFAC) told attendees that their biggest need is for ball fields for youth games. “There are no other baseball diamonds in our area,” said Walters. “They are all booked.” The diamonds at Bossen Field are heavily used by adult leagues that pay rental for the fields.
With that knowledge, participants favored concept two, which retains two under-12 ball fields and two soccer fields.
The other big difference between concept one and two was the inclusion of tennis courts in concept one. However, given that there are new courts at 15th Avenue and Minnehaha Parkway, as well as at Lake Hiawatha Park and Lake Nokomis Park, the tennis courts were given a lower priority, according to Walters.
The concept favored by attendees locates the playground and pool in the southeast corner of the park land, in an area that has been open space since the tennis courts were removed in 2007 because they were in poor condition.
However, community members thought that the playground/pool concept number two as presented was too “formal” and instead preferred the “ambiguous” and “organic” design of concept one, stated Walters.
Bartels is currently working to revise concept two. It will be presented to neighborhood residents at another community meeting; a date has not yet been set for this meeting. “The full extent of the improvements that will be presented in the plan will be determined at the next meeting,” stated Bartels. “We know that a wading pool and playgrounds will be included in the plan.”
The parks department hopes to present the revised plan for Keewaydin Park to the Parks and Recreation Board in May for approval.
COST AND TIMING
After the final design has been approved, the parks department will solicit cost estimates. Then it will begin looking for funding sources. Because the school project was approved last November, the parks department was not able to work these changes into its budget. A new wading pool/splash pad will cost about $500,000, and a new playground about $300,000. It could cost $200,000 to fix the drainage issues on the athletic fields. The parks department has budgeted $500,000 total to split between the service area of Morris, McRea, and Pearl in 2013.
Once funding is identified, the parks department will determine when the equipment will be installed. “There is a push to get the playground open by fall,” said Walters.
-30-


Concept 1 – Central playground with SE tennis courts
PROS
• Playgrounds located closer to school for use by students.
• Parents can easily observe three play containers from a single vantage point.
•Wading pool is near rec center for bathrooms and supervision.
• Tennis courts fill void in geographic distribution in SE metro.
• Tennis courts provide recreational activity for a different age group.

CONS
• Loss of one additional ball field.
• No buffer between fields and playground – possible safety issues.
• Possible expensive and extensive soil corrections required for pool and playgrounds.
• Policing: centrally located playgrounds behind buildings are less visible from the street.
• Retaining walls needed – athletic field grades are three feet lower than rec center.

Concept 2 – SE playground with athletic field
PROS
• Playground buffered from athletic fields by trees and topography
• No fields lost – 2 ballfields and 2 soccer fields
• Policing: area is very visible from the street
• Soils are good; construction less expensive.

CONS
• Distance of playground from school
• Distance between Pre-K structure and K-12 structure will make parental observation more difficult.
  Wading pool distance from building; supervision more difficult
• No tennis courts
• Close to street:  fencing needed at perimeter of playground to meet current playground safety standards.

This story printed in the April 2012 edition of the Longfellow/Nokomis Messenger.

Sabo Bridge closed to pedestrians, bicyclists



Street crossing keeps bicyclists, pedestrians moving along Greenway

by Tesha M. Christensen

When the $5.1 million Sabo Bridge was closed on Feb. 19, 2012, it affected people traveling three ways. Lightrail trains were prohibited from crossing under the bridge until Friday, and passengers were shuttled through that area via bus. Vehicles were rerouted from Hiawatha Ave. onto Cedar for a week. And bicyclists and pedestrians were no longer able to take the bridge and keep out of traffic; instead, they all had to cross at the street level.
Until Minnesota’s only cable suspension bridge is reopened, those bicyclists and pedestrians will continue to dodge vehicles at the 28th St. and Hiawatha Ave. stoplights.
At this point, no one knows when the Sabo Bridge will be reopening. It is, however, stabilized now, pointed out Minneapolis Public Works deputy director Heidi Hamilton.
“Before we design a fix, we want to know what went wrong,” stated Hamilton.
Until that happens, the cost of repairing the bridge is also unknown.
The city is not releasing any opinions on what may have caused the cracks because no one knows what went wrong and won’t until all the facts come in, said Hamilton. “There’s not a lot of value in speculating,” she added.
The bridge had most recently been examined in October. City inspectors gave the cable anchors the highest rating for soundness.
WHAT HAPPENED TO THE BRIDGE?
At 10:06 p.m. Feb. 19, a citizen reported finding a pair of cables lying on the Sabo Bridge deck. City workers responded, and discovered that a partly rusted diaphragm plate had fallen 100 feet from the mast, and released the topmost cable, number nine. A bridge inspector arrived at 2 a.m. to examine the mast, and discovered a second crack in diaphragm plate eight. Crews detoured vehicle traffic away from the site. The problematic effort to shore up the eastern end of the bridge began. These supports will remain in place until the bridge is fixed. One lane of northbound Hiawatha is closed to accommodate these supports.
The main focus the first week was making sure the bridge was stabilized and opening Hiawatha Ave. back up to traffic. Now the focus has shifted to discovering what went wrong.
Minneapolis and Hennepin County have awarded Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates Inc. of Illinois a $100,000 no-bid contract to investigate the cause of anchor plate fractures; the two entities will split the bill. A determination could take four to eight weeks. Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates also received a $2 million, no-bid contract to investigate the cause of the Interstate 35W bridge collapse in 2007.
Representatives of Wiss, Janney and Elstner were on the scene by Wednesday, Feb. 22; they shipped the fallen plate to to Lehigh University in Pennsylvania for forensic analysis.
According to Hamilton, the next day, workers removed tension from diaphragm plate eight, which was also cracked. The number eight cable was detached by engineers on Friday.
Wiss, Janney and Elstner began magnetic particle testing to examine the rest of the bridge’s 18 steel anchors for cracks. A minor defect was discovered and fixed on plate seven, and cracking found on plate five. A temporary redundancy fix was completed the second week of February.
At the same time, the broken edge of plate number nine was removed. “There is a lot of interest in looking at that,” Hamilton pointed out. This piece will also be shipped to Lehigh University for analysis, and will be used to determine why the plate failed.
Some residents have speculated that too much weight on the bridge the day before may have contributed to the plates breaking. Gabriel Hoffman, the Seward representative on the Midtown Greenway Coalition Board, noted, “The situation people seem to be concerned about was the Friday night before the cables snapped, when there was (apparently) a police car, an ambulance, and a fire truck up on the bridge. Now, it is designed to carry that load, so my understanding is that if there wasn’t some underlying problem with the cable supports, it shouldn’t have been a problem.  If there is a problem with the supports, that load may have been the proverbial straw for the camel, but not being an engineer, I would not care to offer an opinion on the matter.”
“The bridge was designed to carry service vehicles,” Hamilton pointed out. The bridge needs to be plowed, and emergency vehicles are able to respond to calls on the bridge.
The city did a good job with the bridge closure, according to Eric Hart, a Cooper resident who doesn’t own a car, but instead bikes wherever he needs to go. “I heard about it fairly quickly and the city was very transparent about what went wrong and what they needed to do to make it safe for the LRT to run and the car traffic to be able to go under it.”
IS THE CROSSING AT 28TH AVE. SAFE?
Until the bridge is back in service, bicyclists and pedestrians will continue to cross at the street level.
As the weather warms up and more pleasure bikers join the commuters, Midtown Greenway Coalition Executive Director and Longfellow resident Soren Jensen anticipates that there will be crowding at the 28th St. lights. Already during these warm spring days there have been long lines of bicyclists waiting to cross. “It could be even more dangerous as bikers at the end struggle to get across,” said Jensen.
“As we get into the summer, and the cyclists on the Midtown Greenway includes more recreational cyclists (as opposed to people doing serious training or commuters), it will be more of an inconvenience, since they tend to feel less comfortable crossing at Hiawatha,” observed Hoffman, who travels on the Greenway every day.
There are several issues with the crossing at 28th and Hiawatha, according to local bikers.
“Drivers tend to be more aggressive on highways and not respect pedestrian right-of-way at crosswalks. They’ll inch forward into the crosswalk,” observed Longfellow resident Mike Jones, who bikes between three to 30 miles each day.
Hart noted, “The lane merging onto Hiawatha on the east side (coming from Lake Street) is probably the most dangerous part of intersection since it is unclear if the cars will stop and they are coming fast most of the time,” Hart said. “The right turn lane off of 28th to southbound Hiawatha is also problematic since cars don’t always look for pedestrians or bicycles before they turn right.”
Five years ago before the Sabo Bridge was constructed everyone used the street, but since then bicycle use has greatly increased in the Minneapolis, Jensen noted. Over 4,000 people use the Greenway each day. Minneapolis is currently second highest in the nation in the number of people commuting to work via bicycle, at 4% of the population; Portland has 6%. And as gas prices increase, Jensen believes more people will ditch their cars for bikes.
Most riders view the Sabo bridge as a safer and faster way to get across Hiawatha, according to Jensen.
“The more we can get people out of traffic, the more they want to bike,” Jensen observed. “People won’t bike unless it is safe.”
He added, “The bridge is part of a network that makes people feel safe. It’s a good investment.” Jensen pointed out that creating bike lanes, fashioning curb bump-outs and creating trails like the Greenway is much cheaper than building roads.
“The Greenway makes getting across south Minneapolis a breeze, and I think the fact that its free of cars and intersections, have encouraged a whole new group of bicyclists to try commuting and getting around by bicycle for the first time and get ‘hooked,’” observed Hart. “I’ve been biking in the city for 20 years and it is much more pleasant to go across south Minneapolis on the Greenway than on 31st or 32nd Streets.”
The city’s traffic division is monitoring the situation at 28th and Hiawatha, according to Hamilton. Changes have been made to the signal timing, but there are no plans to make other changes at the intersection. “Our hope is that this is not a long-term thing. We don’t want to put money into something that is for a short duration,” Hamilton explained.
“We are interested in getting the bridge back in use as soon as possible,” Hamilton said. “We recognize it is a really important crossing for bikers.”



Will people trust bridge when it reopens?
by Tesha M. Christensen

Will people trust the Sabo Bridge when it is reopened?
Longfellow resident Kevin Baumgartner isn’t sure they will. “Its safety record, and the confidence and comfort that goes with it, has been shattered. People may possibly never again have as high of a confidence level with that bridge, and that, in itself, is unfortunate and concerning,” Baumgartner stated.
People he knows in other states have a lowered respect for Minnesota due to the collapse of the 35W bridge in 2007 and the issue associated with the Sabo Bridge now.
“The question I get most is ‘What is wrong with you guys and your bridges?!’” Baumgartner remarked.
He added, “Also, within in 24 hours of the Sabo bridge closure, the Washington Avenue bridge had Central Corridor construction debris (the size of large bricks) fall onto West River Parkway below it.  So, three bridges, all within approximantly one mile radius of each other, have had safety problems that causes the closures of roads. So, a poor public perception of bridges in the state/city by locals and others is natural.”
On the other hand, Longfellow resident Katherine Debertin isn’t any more concerned about crossing bridges now than she was before. “I kind of think of bridges the same way I do about flying - I learned to breathe through crossings and I learned to breathe through take-offs and landings whenever I’m flying,” Debertin stated.
Just as there are investigations into airplane crashes, they are into bridge issues. “I hope that  it translates into better inspection or construction or design or to prevent future incidents,” remarked Debertin.
Howe resident Eli Effinger-Weintraub also hopes that the failure in the Sabo bridge is another wake-up call to examine infrastructure inspection and maintenance procedures and schedules.
Eric Hart, Longfellow’s former representative on the Midtown Greenway Coalition Board, doesn’t see a connection between the I35 bridge collapse and the closure of the Sabo Bridge. “This bridge was in no danger of falling down and nobody was hurt,” he pointed out.
Hart added, “I think the Sabo bridge is unique enough that it won’t effect people’s confidences in other bridges.  There are dozens of standard concrete bridges in the city and there haven’t been dramatic problems with them. The Sabo bridge is unique and the first in the state, so, if anything, people will be critical that they tried to experiment with something that was never tried in Minnesota, etc.  (or shouldn’t have spent so much to make it look flashy).”
Avid bicyclist and Longfellow resident Mike Jones agrees with Hart that the Sabo Bridge damage is different than what occurred with the 35W bridge because it wasn’t a catastrophic failure. He does however see how people would make the comparison “since the same contractor was hired for both bridges.” The Illinois-based engineering firm Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc. investigated the collapse of the 35W bridge and has been hired to determine what went wrong with the Sabo Bridge.
“As people are already using the bridge by going around the barricades, I think people will still use the bridge,” Jones said. “I do think that some people will realize crossing at the light at 28th and Hiawatha is fairly quick and a way to bypass the large grade change in the bridge and will thus not use the bridge.”
DeWayne Townsend, co-chair of the Longfellow Community Council Environment and Transportation Committee has not changed his opinion on the safety of bridges in the area. “Two bridges among the thousands does not indicate a trend,” Townsend said. “I still trust bridges.”
ABOUT THE BRIDGE
The Sabo Bridge was designed by engineering consulting-firm URS. It opened in November 2007, two months after the 35W bridge over the Mississippi collapsed. The bridge has a total length of 2,200 feet with the main span over Hiawatha at 220 feet. While Hennepin County oversaw construction of the bridge, it transferred ownership to the city of Minneapolis in 2008.

This story printed in the April edition of the Longfellow/Nokomis Messenger.

Wednesday, March 28, 2012

Broadway at Longfellow offers teen mothers chance to graduate

Longfellow School reopened fall 2011 after a year closure


by Tesha M. Christensen

Lourdes Meza-Molina wanted a chance to graduate from high school, even if she is a teen mom.
The 19-year-old mother of two is one of over 100 students enrolled at Broadway at Longfellow School, 3017 East 31st St., an alternative learning program for pregnant and parenting mothers.
They all face challenges, but the benefit of Broadway is that they can face them together.
Broadway gives Carol Smith, 17, a needed support network she doesn’t think she’d find in another school. “We can all relate to each other,” Smith observed. The moms with older kids give advice to those who are pregnant and have recently given birth. They share stories about their kids. Each faces the same sort of challenges: childcare, baby daddy issues, balancing work and school, keeping a roof over their heads, and feeding their families.
Kiara Bryant-Campbell, 17, stayed at her high school when she found out she was pregnant, but “it didn’t work out.” She felt ostracized by fellow students, and discovered she didn’t have as much in common with them as she did before. At Broadway, “you don’t feel like the odd one out,” she said.
Keeping up with old friends isn’t easy when you’re a teenage mom. When she can’t go out because she doesn’t have a babysitter, some friends get angry, Bryant-Campbell observed. “They don’t understand how it is,” she said. “I’ve got a kid. They need to come up with things we both can do with my kid. A lot of people don’t understand that.”
Smith also tried to stay at her high school after learning she was pregnant, but it was hard to focus on studying when she was suffering from morning sickness and had to run out of class. She likes it that the teachers at Broadway don’t play the “sympathy card,” but instead expect the same of everyone.
“We want people to motivate us, not say, ‘You’ve got a baby so it’s okay if you don’t do your work,” agreed Bryant-Campbell.
Fa Vang, 18, pointed out that at Broadway, there isn’t the same focus on attendance you find at typical high schools, because staff understand when students can’t make it because either they or their child is sick. The mother of three-year-old twins appreciates both the independence and the camaraderie offered at Broadway. 
“We’re all girls and we’re all in the same situation,” Vang said.
Classes at Broadway are offered as either seated classes or as blended-online classes, and they are completed at one’s own pace. Students work in a day-long advisory in the subjects they need to complete to graduate and prepare for college. They choose how they will accomplish their goals –with support of teachers and instructional support staff, through Project-Based Learning (PBL), small group projects and seminars.
The students at Broadway feel supported by the staff and teachers, both in their academics and personal lives. “If we’re feeling down about something, they give us advice,” noted Vang.
“Even though they are here to do a job, they have a way of making you feel comfortable,” Smith added.
The benefits go beyond the classroom. Students are eligible for childcare located within the building, and on Thursdays both staff members and students gather there to interact with the kids. They also get in-home visits from the school nurse, who not only does well-baby visits, but talks about post-partum depression and ways to get a dad more involved. Students can access free parenting supplies, such as cribs, clothes, car seats, and more.
Having childcare located in the same building as her classes was a big draw to Yessica Meza-Molina, 20. She likes being able to check in on her one-year-old child during her lunch break.
Last year, when Broadway was housed at North High School, only half of the children in daycare were located within the same facility. Although they were accessible via a 10-minute bus ride, it wasn’t the same, according to program director Diane Glawe. It’s been nice for both students and staff to have a home of their own this year, rather than sharing space with another school. The other programs housed at the Longfellow building support the Broadway program. Early Childhood Family Education (ECFE) classes and Special Education ECFE classes are offered there.
There is a health clinic, and in a portable unit out back, Hennepin County staff members meet with students to discuss childcare assistance, welfare needs, medical assistance and various other programs students can tap into.
Moving into south Minneapolis in the fall of 2011 from its long-time home in north Minneapolis hasn’t hurt the program, Glawe stated, despite fears it would. North-side students are still attending, in part because of the curb-to-curb service offered. Any student within the city of Minneapolis can take a bus to the school, and there are car seats already strapped inside to make it easier for the young moms and their children.
Many of the students now enrolled in the Broadway program had dropped out of school previously. “It’s a way of bringing them back to the fold,” explained Glawe.
Like most of the students at Broadway, Smith’s dreams and priorities have changed since she became a mom. Instead of living on campus at the University of Minnesota while she earns a nursing degree, Smith will go to a school that is more flexible, such as the Minneapolis Community and Technical School. “It will allow me to get my work done and at the end of the day go home to my daughter,” she explained.
Things also changed for Bryant-Campbell. Because she knows that she’ll need her family around to help care for her son, she has shelved her dreams of attending college down south. “It’s not just me, but me and my son,” she stated. “I am more focused on my son than me.”
Obtaining her high school degree didn’t used to be important to L. Meza-Molina. But now she wants to be a good example for her children. She wants to be able to tell them: “If I achieved that, you can too.”
Her sister, Y. Meza-Molina agreed. “You want to be a better person,” she said. “You want to be educated for your children. You want to give them everything you don’t have.”
-30-

SIDEBAR

LONGFELLOW SCHOOL

Longfellow Community School, located at the corner of 31st Ave. and 31st St. was built in 1918. It was closed in 2010.

Broadway at Longfellow School moved into the vacant Longfellow Elementary School building in the fall of 2011. The program caters to over 100 teenage mothers up to age 21 from across Minneapolis. While the program itself isn’t new, the move from North High School (where it had been located since the district opted to develop its headquarters at Broadway High School, 1250 West Broadway Avenue) to Longfellow enabled the program to have a home of its own, rather than share space with another high school.

Learn more about the program at: http://broadway.mpls.k12.mn.us or call 612-668-4700.

This story was printed in the March 2012 edition of the Longfellow/Nokomis Messenger.

Cedar Towing may lose its license

Company waiting for issue to be resolved before moving into Longfellow





by Tesha M. Christensen

Cedar Towing intended to move into the Longfellow neighborhood last fall, but is still waiting for the city’s approval. Because its license to operate hasn’t been renewed, city staff won’t sign off on the necessary paperwork for the move from 359 Hoover Street in the University neighborhood to 3527 Dight Ave. S. in the Longfellow neighborhood.
When Cedar Towing sought to renew its operating license in September 2011, the city initiated an investigation into their business practices.
Although the attorney’s office declined to press criminal charges in December, Minneapolis has announced its intention to deny the company’s license to operate because of numerous code violations, including overcharging customers and allowing its own employee to authorize tows from private property. It has allowed the company to operate since September until these issues are resolved.
Cedar Towing is the city’s largest of five towing companies. In 2008, Cedar Towing agreed to pay $1,341 in fines for various violations, some of the same ones the company is accused of repeating in 2011.
CEDAR TOWING’S OPTIONS
A letter written to Cedar Towing President Julie Rodriquez by Dana Banwer of Minneapolis’ licensing and environmental services division on Jan. 26, 2012 laid out three options for the company. One, surrender its business license. Two, acknowledge the violations did occur and allow the Minneapolis City Council to determine if any adverse license action should be taken such as the revocation or denial of Cedar’s business license, suspensions, administrative fines or additional business license operating conditions. Or three, opt to have the case be presented to an administrative law judge.
 “The city believes that we have the evidence to back up what we said in the letter to them,” noted Minneapolis Licenses Division Manager Grant Wilson. “We are not making stuff up. We believe these things are true or we would not have taken this road.”
Based on evidence gathered during a search warrant, the city believes Cedar Towing overcharged customers by $88,424.50 between Jan. 1, 2011 and Oct. 18, 2011. “We suspect this has been going on for a number of years,” Wilson stated.
The current towing fee set by the city’s ordinance is $212. The storage fee is $28 a day. Cedar Towing has been charging the storage fee on the first day a vehicle is towed, rather than beginning on the second day as stated in the city ordinance. Rasmus argued, “There is no language in the service fee section of the Ordinance (section 349.270) that suggests in any way that storage fees may not be charged on the first day of a tow, or that a licensee must wait until after midnight of the day a vehicle is towed to charge storage fees,” argued Rasmus.
Representatives from the city and Cedar Towing met on Thursday, Feb. 9. Cedar Towing asked for one week to decide which option to pursue (go before the city council or an administrative law judge). They were given a deadline of Feb. 17, according to Wilson.
“We’re working with the city to resolve these issues and we’re hopeful,” stated Cedar Towing’s attorney Dan Rasmus.
RELOCATION INTO LONGFELLOW
Cedar Towing’s business operations include service tows, motor club towing/services, impound towing, jump starts, lock-outs, winching, tire changes and gas fills. Cedar Towing also provides snow plowing services, lot sweeping and a striping service. The business holds an Auto Lien Auction most Tuesdays at 11 a.m.
The announcement last fall that Cedar Towing intended to move into the Longfellow neighborhood was met with some trepidation as neighbors expressed concerns about whether the impound lot would generate crime, lower property values and increase noise and traffic. Others were pleased that the building that once housed John’s Welding Service would be used again, and that outside art on the property would be preserved.
To move into the vacant property, Cedar Towing asked the city to remove the pedestrian-oriented overlay on the property, which prohibited a towing company. It also asked for a conditional use permit and a variance of the off-street parking requirement. The city’s planning division recommended that the city deny Cedar Towing’s request as it does not match the city’s comprehensive plan. However, Planning Commission members approved it at the Aug. 29, 2011 meeting and it was subsequently approved by the City Council at its Sept. 2 meeting. Before moving into the Dight Ave. location, Cedar Towing was required to comply with various landscaping and site conditions, including the remodel of the building to create a front entrance off Dight Ave.

-30-

SIDEBAR



VIOLATIONS AND RESPONSES
The following are a list of violations alleged by the city, followed Cedar Towing’s response provided to the city via a letter written by attorney Dan Rasmus.
1) Charging towing service fees in excess of those allowed by the city’s ordinances.
Cedar’s attorney Dan Rasmus pointed out that the service fee provision in the ordinance places a cap of service fees but it does not state that storage fees can’t be charged. “There is no language in the service fee section of the Ordinance (section 349.270) that suggests in any way that storage fees may not be charged on the first day of a tow, or that a licensee must wait until after midnight of the day a vehicle is towed to charge storage fees,” argued Rasmus.
2) Failure to accept credit cards as a form of payment on all days of the week.
Ramsus pointed out that Cedar Towing was having trouble with its credit card providers during a “small number of weekends” which made it unable to accept credit card payments. However, the situation has been resolved.
3) Conducting private impound towing services from private parking lots where there are no entrance warning signs posted.
According to Rasmus, this allegation involves a lot Cedar Towing shared responsibility over with another company. Because Cedar Towing didn’t own the lot, it couldn’t post a sign. “There was no intentional violation of the ordinance when vehicles were towed by Cedar Towing,” Rasmus stated.
4) Conducting private impound towing services without proper authorization.
“Cedar Towing strives to prevent tows from lots where signs are not posted or where alleged non-compliant signs are in place,” stated Rasmus. “Any alleged violations of this provision were unintentional.”
5) Conducting private impound towing services without completing a tow order form as required. (This violation is a repeat from August 2007.)
This allegation involves a disagreement between the city and Cedar Towing about what information should be released to vehicle owners, according to Rasmus. Cedar Towing expressed concerns about releasing the contact information of lot owners to vehicle owners, fearing that such information would be used by vehicle owners to retaliate against the lot owners. Rasmus stated that a new form was developed to protect lot owners from harm, and to his knowledge, “all parties are satisfied with the current use of this form.” 
6) Providing remuneration to parking lot operators in the form of parking lot security patrol services.
It can be unsafe for property lot owners to deal with individuals whose vehicles are about to be towed, stated Rasmus. “The work is better left to trained tow operators.”
7) Failure to immediately transport private impounded vehicles to a licensed storage facility. (This violation is a repeat from August 2007.)
“There were unique circumstances surrounding the alleged practice that led to a citation,” stated Rasmus. He added that this issue was already addressed and resolved by a Consent Degree in December 2010.

This story was printed in the March 2012 edition of the Longfellow/Nokomis Messenger.

Give input on Keewaydin park plan March 6

Parks department working to relocate pool and playground




by Tesha M. Christensen

Check out the new design for the Keewaydin Park on Tuesday, March 6, 2012 at 7 p.m. The meeting will be held at the Keewaydin Park Recreation Center, 3030 E. 53rd St.
Since gathering input from community residents during a meeting Jan. 21, Minneapolis Parks and Recreation staff has been working on a new master plan for the park. The expansion of Lake Nokomis Community School’s Keewaydin  Campus has prompted this redesign, as the existing playground and wading pool are on school-owned land and will need to be relocated. The park board supported building to the south in order to preserve the athletic fields on the east.
“I greatly appreciate that over 35 members of the Keewaydin community came out for the Keewaydin Park workshop,” said Fifth District Commissioner Carol Kummer. “This level of participation shows how much people care about this park.”
WHAT DO COMMUNITY RESIDENTS WANT?
Some common themes expressed during the Jan. 21 meeting were replacing the play equipment and water features; aligning the fields to better serve youth softball, baseball and soccer; and saving the trees and as much green space as possible, stated Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board Manager of Public Engagement and Citywide Planning Jennifer Ringold.
“We were impressed with the level of similarity in the features desired by the participants,” stated Ringold.
Some wanted a new tennis court. The former ones were removed in 2007 because they were in poor condition, not because they weren’t getting used. It will cost between $50,000 - $75,000 to install a single tennis court.
While some of the existing items can be moved to another spot at the park, others, such as the main play structure, much of the equipment in the Pre-K container, the seesaw, and the spring animals can’t. They are nearing the end of their life expectancy, explained Ringold. A playground generally lasts about 20 years. “The larger play structure, although faded, and Galaxy Spica spinners for the older children are in good condition and can be moved. It is probably more economical to replace the swings.  However, the safety zone for swings are big consumers of space; we might not have room to replace these,” she added.
Additionally, the park board won’t reuse any equipment that doesn’t meet existing safety and handicap-accessible standards.
The estimated cost for a new wading pool/splash pad is $500,000, and a new playground will cost about $300,000.
The athletic fields have drainage issues and could also use renovation, which would cost about $200,000, according to Ringold.
The fields are used most heavily for soccer; last year there were eight teams with 91 participants. They are also used for baseball and softball. Over the last three years, soccer and baseball enrollment has stayed steady. The number of softball teams dropped from four teams to two teams in 2011. However, all four existing field are in poor condition, damaged by heavy use and ice sheets. They are no longer flooded for ice skating in the winter.
Jay Larson, a member of the school steering committee, attended the park meeting in January. He said it was reassuring for him to hear that the pool would likely have been replaced by the park board within the next few years, and that the playground equipment was nearing the end of its life expectancy.
“After this meeting, and as a Keewaydin resident who lives only a couple of blocks from the park, I feel much better about the school and park’s decision to partner and move forward with the demolition and rebuild of Keewaydin’s playground and pool,” Larson stated.
“I will admit, being a parent of three young children who use Keewaydin park almost daily during the warmer months and having to possibly live without a park for a summer or two will be rough.  However, we will simply walk a few more blocks away and be able to utilize other nearby parks with playground equipment and wading pool (such as Hiawatha or Nokomis).”
WHERE WILL THE MONEY COME FROM?
The parks department has not yet identified where the money to move and/or purchase new playground equipment and a pool will come from. According to Ringold, the parks department has budgeted $500,000 total to split between the service area of Morris, McRea, and Pearl in 2013. “We expect some of this funding will help with improvements for Keewaydin,” Ringold stated. “We will also be working with other possible funders and looking for grants after the master planning is complete.”
Will Keewaydin School allocate some of its $16 million construction budget for the playground? Until the steering committee finalizes the design and receives estimates, the school doesn’t know what its budget will cover, according to Larson. “The current playground and pool just south of the school is a priority for the committee and much discussion is happening in/around what to do,” he remarked.
Keewaydin School has not yet identified when the playground will be removed to accommodate the construction project. Construction is slated to begin as soon as classes let out in June.
Larson observed that at this time, “We do not know how the construction timeline will lay out and how this will effect recess time for the students at Keewaydin.  However, it is most likely that students will be re-directed to another location for recess during construction.”
WHAT’S NEXT?
At the March 6 meeting, attendees will review the concepts developed based on the Jan. 21 meeting and identify the community’s preferred plan. This preferred plan will become the master plan that is presented to the Board of Commissioners for approval. Park staff anticipate bringing the master plan to the Board of Commissioners in April.
For further information, visit the park project page on the MPRB website: http://www.minneapolisparks.org/default.asp?PageID=1320.

-30-

SIDEBARS

COMMENTS FROM RESIDENTS
Thirty-five residents attended a planning session about the park on Jan. 21. Here are some of their comments:
• This is a young child playground.
• Basketball is available at the great new school. Place court on school property.
• Keep the rec center separate from the school; it is in good condition and serves its purpose well. The space is adequate for young kids.
• Preserve the sledding hills on the east side: they are used a ton and they are the only sledding hills near this neighborhood.
• Preserve the green space. Keep as many trees as possible.
• Maintain the diversity of activities in the park for children from Pre-K to grades K-8.
• Keep all play areas close together and seating/picnic areas close to the play structures.
• Create parking sufficient for evening activities. Consider street parking impact on neighborhood).

HISTORY OF KEEWAYDIN PARK

1927 - City and school district agree to cooperate on the purchase and use of a new school and playground, which would generate a “substantial saving” to the city.

1929 - Playing fields, skating and hockey rinks in use.

1932 - Four tennis courts and concrete wading pool finished. The playground was located where it currently is, while the pool was where the Rec Center is today. There were four tennis courts in the southeast corner.

1972 - Recreation center opened. Four tennis courts reduced to two. Parking lot, playgrounds, hard surface court, and wading pool are in current locations.

2000 - The school board contributed
$30,000, the Nokomis East Neighborhood Association contributed $70,000 and the MPRB contributed $200,000 to replace the playground, improve the wading pool and resurface the basketball area.

2007 - Tennis courts removed due to poor condition. The use of the athletic fields for skating has been discontinued.

Information courtesy of Deborah Bartels of the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board.


This story was printed in the March 2012 edition of the Longfellow/Nokomis Messenger.
Related Posts with Thumbnails